12th March 2009 by Giles Smith
Quote from BBC.co.uk
Tom Watson MP, minister for digital engagement, said open source software would be on a level playing field with proprietary software such as Windows.
Open source software will be adopted “when it delivers best value for money”, the government said.
It added that public services should where possible avoid being “locked into proprietary software”.
It is great to see that even governments are realising that there is quality community built software around that fulfils their needs just as well and probably better than any proprietary softare can do.
On several occasions I have argued the whole OpenOffice.org vs Microsoft Office and the only argument I ever really get is that Microsoft Office is what they know. This indicates towards how much the average user is afraid of moving away from ‘what they know’ and finding an alternative. Even though the alternative has all of the functionality (and more), has fewer bugs, is more stable and doesn’t cost a penny to use, upgrade or be supported compared with the product that they are used to. In the case of OpenOffice.org their alternative even looks like Office so that you can instantly feel at home using it.
With the recent economic climate there is also another reason why proprietary software isn’t such a great idea. Smari McCarthy talks about a new crisis about to hit businesses in Iceland:
Smari McCarthy:
The companies and institutions that buy these generally don’t buy these directly through Microsoft. Instead, they sell contracts in bulk to Microsoft Certified Partners (MCPs), which are local companies that lobby the software, generally at a loss to themselves, as they know that Microsoft’s lock-in is powerful enough that they can only get service contracts from the company if they offer a substantial discount on the Microsoft products.
Now, the licensing term is three years, but the licensing fee is made in the form of annual payments. Here is where the fun begins.
Now, say an economy collapses. Say some fifteen hundred companies in your local economy go bankrupt. Now, say that Microsoft comes to collect its annual fee from the MCPs. The MCPs say, of course, “wait, the company that we sold this license to has gone bankrupt, we shouldn’t have to pay.”
“Aha!” says the suit from Redmond. “You made a contract with us, and another with them. Their inability to uphold their end of the contract does not invalidate your commitment to us.”
One of the biggest mistakes users make when trying out Open Source software is that they immediately want to know if they can use their favourite application. The answer is often ‘No’ however there is always an alternative. I have already mentioned OpenOffice.org for Microsoft Office. Here are a few more:
- Internet Explorer – Mozilla Firefox
- Outlook Express/Outlook – Evolution, Mozilla Thunderbird, Kmail
- Adobe Acrobat – Ghostscript, OpenOffice.org
- Windows Media Player – Amarok, Rhythmbox, Songbird, VLC, MPlayer
- Adobe Photoshop, Paint Shop Pro – Gimp, ImageMagick
- Adobe Illustrator – Inkscape, Sketch
This is only a few highlights from a much larger list but if you look at the list you will quickly see that your options in the Open Source world are far greater, than any paid for software.
Lets hope the British Government really mean what they say and start to advocate the use of Open Source software so we the public can stop having to pay for all to often shoddy software…
Tags: british government, digital engagement, open source, proprietary, software
Categories: IT, Tech & Internet •
1 Comment »
29th October 2008 by Giles Smith
BMW is looking pioneer a move away from proprietary systems used for in-car entertainment systems, allowing developers to build plug and play applications especially for their cars. This could be extremely good news for the open source community and another ‘notch in the bed post’ in the fight against closed source systems.
When a manufacturer or software provider uses closed source systems those systems are then not open to modification and customisation by it’s user. A user is essentially restricted by what that manufacturer or provider allows you to do, which is often not a lot. Closed source systems don’t allow interaction with other company’s products and whilst this may be preferable to that company, as it ties the user to their products it doesn’t really benefit the consumer leaving them frustrated and annoyed.
Apple’s iPod is a great example of this problem. Originally Apple didn’t allow interaction between their product and 3rd party products. This meant that a Linux user couldn’t use an iPod as they had no method of song management because iTunes is not compatible with Linux Operating Systems. Similarly if you had an iPod dock to play your music out loud, you couldn’t use that dock to play music from a 3rd party MP3 player. This has since changed as many developers and hardware providers have found ways of ‘hacking’ into the iPod and forcing it to be compatible with their systems.
“We were convinced we had to develop an open platform that would allow for open software since the speed in the infotainment and entertainment industry requires us to be on a much faster track,”
said Gunter Reichart, BMW vice president of driver assistance, body electronics and electrical networks.
“We invite other OEMs to join with us, to exchange with us. We are open to exchange with others.”
A great example of the power of Open Source systems that most of us can relate to has to be the Mozilla Firefox Internet Browser software. Thousands of add ons have been developed by a thriving community of developers to enhance the functionality of the browser and talking from personal experience, I simply cannot use other web browsers as they just don’t provide what I need.
Well done BMW, lets hope you can convince the other manufaturers to follow your example.
Tags: apple, bmw, car, developer, entertainment, ipod, open source, proprietary, software
Categories: IT, Tech & Internet •
No Comments »
29th August 2008 by Giles Smith
Tags: developer, pain, software, time
Categories: Mistfits & Humour •
No Comments »
17th June 2008 by Giles Smith
“Developers,” a VP at Electronic Arts once told me, explaining why there were so many me-too Windows applications, “will walk through the desert in their socks to get to an installed base.”
True enough. But it doesn’t quite explain the results of a survey issued last week by Evans Data Corp. The headline was that most developers are still not targeting Windows Vista when they write new apps. Only 8% of the 380 developers surveyed were writing for Vista; 49% were still targeting Windows XP.
I welcome any increase in development of non Windows Software, even if it is mainly an increase for a Macs (which I dislike only slightly less than Windowz).
As a Linux user and LAMP developer I have been very happy to see an increase in software dedicated to the linux environment. Up until the last few years Linux desktop users have had to put up with ported versions of windows software that often requires quite an advanced knowledge of wine to get working, but now dedicated LInux software is emergine that not only competes with Windows based software, now quite often outperforms it on both a funcationality and an efficiency front.
I still think Macs are far to slow to be any real competition to windows though…
Tags: development, LAMP, mac, microsoft, software, vista, windows, xp
Categories: IT, Tech & Internet •
1 Comment »